Reflection of the sustainable urban mobility paradigm shift in teaching at three European universities
Main Article Content
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the urban transport planning framework has changed significantly towards sustainable mobility planning. It brings new requirements for the education of transport experts. In the paper, we discuss the future of academic education concerning these changes based on case studies of two prestigious technical faculties in Germany and Poland and a social science faculty in Czechia offering study programmes related to sustainable urban mobility planning. We applied a self-assessment questionnaire to investigate how the study programmes prepare future mobility managers and present the concept of sustainable mobility to students. Our results show that the existing study programmes do not cover all steps of sustainable urban mobility plan development. We identified a few gaps common to the technical and social science faculties, such as consensus-seeking knowledge and methods, monitoring and evaluation tools and approaches, and the development of soft skills (presentation and communication skills and stakeholder involvement techniques).
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Banister, D., 2008. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15 (2008), 73–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
Brůhová Foltýnová, H., Vejchodská, E., Rybová, K., Květoň, V., 2020. Sustainable urban mobility: One definition, different stakeholders’ opinions. Transportation Research Part D: Trans-port and Environment, 87(2020),102465, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102465
Brůhová Foltýnová, H., Attard, M., Melo, S., 2018. Topical collection on the role of planning towards sustainable urban mobility. European Transport Research Review, 10 (2), 1-2, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-018-0310-z
Emberger, G., May A., 2017. Challenges in the development of national policies on trans-port. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 9 (2017), 55, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0271-7
Gil, A., Calado, H., Bentz, J., 2011. Public participation in municipal transport planning pro-cesses – the case of the sustainable mobility plan of Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal. Journal of Transport Geography, 19 (2011), 1309–1319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.06.010
Hambleton, R. 2006. Purpose and Collegiality in Planning Education: An International Per-spective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 107–117, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X06290936
Holden, E., Banister, D., Gössling, S., Gilpin, G., Linnerud, K. 2020. Grand Narratives for sustainable mobility: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science. 65 (2020), 101454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101454
Hull, A. 2008. Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy. 15 (2008), 94–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004
Jordová, R, Brůhová-Foltýnová, H. 2021. Rise of a New Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning Paradigm in Local Governance: Does the SUMP Make a Difference? Sustainability 2021, 13, 5950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115950
Krizek, K., Levinson, D. 2005. Teaching Integrated Land Use–Transportation Planning: To-pics, Readings, and Strategies. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 304–316, https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04267731
May, A., Boehler-Baedecker, S., Delgado, L., Durlin, T., Enache, M., van der Pas, J.W. 2017. Appropriate national policy frameworks for sustainable urban mobility plans. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. (2017) 9: 7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0224-1
Rupprecht, S., Brand, L., Boehler-Baedecker, S., Brunner, L.M., Colclough, A., Dragutescu, A., Horvat, M., Durlin, T., Werland, S., Rudolph, F., 2019. Guidelines for Developing and Imple-menting a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan, Second Edition. Rupprecht Consult – Forschung & Beratung GmbH (editor)
Wu, Y.J., Lu, C.J., Lirn, T., Yuan, C. 2014. An overview of university level sustainable trans-portation curricula in North America and Europe. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 26, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.10.006
Zhou, J., Schweitzer, L. 2012. Transportation Planning Education in the United States: Lite-rature Review, Course Survey, and Findings. Transportation Research Record, 2109(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3141/2109-01