“Landscape and Evolution”? Landscape perception and evolutionary-psychological theories
Main Article Content
Abstract
Metrics
Article Details
The publication of the journal is carried out in accordance with Czech law, in particular the Press Act No. 46/2000 Coll., the Copyright Act No. 121/2000 Coll., and the laws of the European Union. In accordance with the relevant provisions of Act No. 121/2000 Coll., the Copyright Act, as amended, the rights to published texts are always held by their author. The journal has only the right to use the text in the sense of its distribution through its printed and electronic form, in accordance with the provisions of Article 12(4)(b) of the Copyright Act.
References
ANDREWS, M. 1999. Landscape and Western Art. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
APPLETON, J. 1975. The Experience of Landscape. London: Wiley.
BALLING, J. D FALK, J. H. 1982. Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, roč. 14, no.1, s. 5-28.
BARRETT, L., DUNBAR, R., LYCETT, J. 2007. Evoluční psychologie člověka. Praha: Portál.
BOWLBY, J. 1969-1982. Attachment and Loss (3 sv.). New York: Basic Books.
CATON, H. 2007. Getting our History Right: Six Errors about Darwin and his Influence. Evolutionary Psychology, roč. 5, no.1, s. 53 - 69.
COETERIER, J. F.1996. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. In Landscape and Urban Planning. roč. 34, no. 1, s. 27-44.
ECKHART, V., GRAMMER, K. (eds.) 2003. Evolutionary Aesthetics. Heidelberg: Springer.
EIBL-EIBESFELDT, I. 1984. Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens. München. Piper-Verlag
EHRLICH, P. R., EHRLICH, A. H.1992. The value of biodiversity. Ambio, roč. 21, no. 3, s. 219-226.
INGOLD, T. 2000. The Poverty of Selectionism. Anthropology Today, roč. 16 no. 3, s. 1-2.
IRONS, W. 1998: Adaptively Relevant Environments versus Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness. Evolutionary Antropology, roč. 6, no. 6, s. 194-204.
KAPLAN, S. 1987. Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behaviour, roč. 19, no. 1, s. 3-32.
KAPLAN, R., KAPLAN, S. 1989: The experience of nature: a psychological prespective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
KAPLAN, S.: 1992. In BARKOW, J. H., COSMIDES, L., TOOBY, J. (eds.) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 561-600.
KOUCKÁ: 2006. Láska ke krajině. Psychologie dnes, no. 11. Dostupný z WWW: http://www.portal.cz/scripts/detail.php?id=20556.
LORENTZ, I. von. 1935. Naturgefühl. In: PAULY, A., WISSOWA, G. (eds.) Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, sloupec 1825-1827.
MacARTHUR, R., WILSON, E. O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
MICHEL, G. F., MOOREOVÁ, C. L. 1999. Psychobiologie. Praha: Portál 1999.
ORIANS, G. H. 1980. Habitat selection: general theory and application to human behavior. In LOCKHARD, J. S. (ed.). 1980. The Evolution of Human Social Behavior. New York: Elsevier, s. 49-66
PANKSEPP, J., PANKSEPP, J. B. 2000. The Seven Sins of Evolutionary Psychology. Evolution and Cognition, roč. 6, no. 2, s.108-131.
ORIANS, G. H., HEERWAGEN, J. H.: Evolved Responses to Landscapes. In BARKOW, J. H., COSMIDES, L., TOOBY, J.(Eds.): The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford Press 1992
RUSO, B., RENNINGER, L. A., ATZWANGER, K. 2003. Human Habitat Preference: A Generative Territory for Evolutionary Aesthetics Research. In ECKHART, V., GRAMMER, K. (eds.) Evolutionary Aesthetics. Heidelberg: Springer, s. 279-294.
STELLA, M., KLEISNER, K. 2006. Odvrácená strana umweltu aneb o čem se (ne)mluví. In KLIKOVÁ, A., KLEISNER, K. Umwelt. Koncepce žitého světa Jakoba von Uexkülla, Červený Kostelec: Mervart, s. 123-159.
SYMONS, D. 1989. A critique of darwinian antropology. In Ethology and Sociobiology, roč.10, no. 1-3, s.131-144.
SYMONS, D. 1990. Adaptiveness and adaptation. Ethology and Sociobiology, roč. 11, no. 4-5, s. 427-444.
SYMONS, D. 1992. On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the Study of human behavior. In BARKOW, J. H., COSMIDES, L., TOOBY, J. (eds.) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 137-162.
SYNECK, E. 1998. Evolutionary Aesthetics: Visual Complexity and the development of human landscape preferences. Vienna: University of Vienna.
SUMMIT, J., SOMMER, R. 1999. Further Studies of Preferred Tree Shapes. Ecology and Behavior. roč. 31, no. 4, s. 550-576.
COSMIDES, L., TOOBY, J. 1987. From evolution to behavior: evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In DUPRÉ, J. The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality. Cambridge: MIT Press, s. 277-306.
UEXKÜLL, J. 1920. Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Springer.
ULRICH, R. S. 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In ALTMANN, I., WOHLWILL, J. F.(eds.). Behavior and the Natural Environment. New York: Plenum, s. 85-125
ULRICH, R. S. 1986. Human response to vegetation and landscape. Landscape and Urban Planing, roč. 13, no.1, s. 29-44.