The Educational Contribution of Zoo’s: Ethical Reflection




environmental education; zoo visitors; research of visitor’s impact; conservation attitude; captive animals


One of the zoo’s primary goals is education and training in ecology and conservation. This contribution to changing the human approach to nature and halting the extinction of species, which should somehow legitimize the keeping of wild animals in captivity, is being challenged. Research can show the reality of educational benefits. The text deals with the results of research on the educational benefits of zoos and their analyses. It is assumed that a visit of the zoo should contribute to pro-environmental sentiment, conservation ethos, attitudes and behaviours, biodiversity literacy and more. However, conclusions from the research are so far at least ambiguous. The aim of this paper is to point out, in the context of this latest research, other relevant factors that may influence people's attitudes and the potential educational benefits of zoos in other areas.


Download data is not yet available.


[AZA] Association of zoos and aquariums (© 1997–2021). Visitor demographics. In Association of zoos and aquariums [online]. Dostupné z: [cit. 18.1.2021]

Acampora, R. (2008). Zoos and eyes: Contesting captivity and seeking successor practices. In S.J. Armstron & R.G. Botzler (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader, 501-506. 2. vydání. Londýn, UK: Routledge.

Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 367-383.

Balmford, A., Leader-Williams, N., Mace, G., M., Manica, A., Walter, O., West, Ch., Zimmermann, A. (2007). Message received? Quantifying the impact of informal conservation education on adults visiting UK zoos. In A. Zimmermann at al. (eds.), Zoos in the 21st Century, 120-136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barney, E. C., Mintzes, J. J., & Yen, C. F. (2005). Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward charismatic megafauna: The case of dolphins. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(2), 41-55. DOI: 10.3200/JOEE.36.2.41-55

Bayma, T. (2012). Rational myth making and environment shaping: The transformation of the zoo. The Sociological Quarterly 53(1), 116-141.

Bekoff, M. (2007). The Emotional Lives of Animals. A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy, and Why they Matter. Novato, California: New World Library

Bradshaw, G., Marino, L. (2007). Minds of their own: The exciting new field of trans-species psychology, Best Friends Magazine, Nov./Dec.

Braverman, I. (2012). Zooland: The Institution of Captivity. Stanford University Press.

Braverman, I. (2014). Conservation without nature: The trouble with in situ versus ex situ conservation. Geoforum 51, 47–57.

Bulbeck, Ch. (2005). Facing the Wild. Ecotourism, Conservation and Animal Encounters. London: Earthscan.

Bulbeck, Ch. (2010). Respectful stewardship of a hybrid nature: The role of concrete encounters. In R. R. Acampora (ed.), Metamorphoses of the ZOO: Animal Encounter after Noah, 83-101. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Clubb, R., Mason, G. (2003). Captivity effects on wide-ranging carnivores. Nature 425(2) DOI: 10.1038/425473a

Collins, C., Quirke, T., McKeown, S., Flannery, K., Kennedy, D., & O’Riordan, R. (2019). Zoological education: Can it change behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science [online]. 220 (104857), 1-10. Dostupné z: [cit. 31.1.2020].

Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, N. L., Heimlich, J. E. (2007). Why Zoos &Aquariums matter: Assesing the impact of visit to a Zoo or Aquarium, In Association of Zoos and aquariums [online]. Dostupné z:; [cit. 7. 2. 2018].

Gruen, L. (2011). Ethics and animals: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gruen, L. (2016). Shifting toward an ethics of sanctuary. In Center for Humans & Nature [online]. Dostupné z: [cit. 27.1.2021]

Hancocks, D. (1995). Lions and tigers and bears, oh no!. In B.G. Norton & M. Hutchins (eds.), Ethics on the Ark. ZOOS, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation (31-37), Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Hrdá, M. (2018). Jsme tím, jak zacházíme se zvířaty. Filosofický časopis, 66(6), 909-933.

Hutchins, M., Smith, B. & Allard, R. (2008). In Defense of Zoos and Aquariums: The Ethical Basis for Keeping Wild Animals in Captivity. In Armstrong, S. J. Botzler – R. G. (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader. 513-521. 2. vydání. London–New York, Routlege.

Jamieson, D. (1985). Against Zoos. In P. Singer (ed.), In Defense of Animals, 108-117, New York: Basil Blackwell.

Kagan, R. (2016). The Show is Over. In Center for Humans & Nature [online]. Dostupné z: [cit. 9.3.2021]

Landová, E., Lišková, S., & Frynta, D. (2014). Je krása vstupenkou na archu Noemovu? In O. Dadejík, F. Jaroš, & M. Kaplický (eds.), Krása a zvíře. Studie o vztahu estetických a etických hodnot zvířat, 33-102. Praha: Dokořán.

Mann‐Lang, J. B., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2016). Does more education mean less fun? A comparison of two animal presentations. International Zoo Yearbook, 50 (1), 155-164.

Maple, T., McManamon, R. & Stevens, E. (1995), Defining the Good Zoo. Animal Care, Maintenance and Welfare. In Norton, B. G., Hutchins, M. (eds.), Ethics on the Ark. ZOOS, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation, (219-234). Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Marino, L. (2016). Emphasizing animal well-being and choice: why zoos and aquarium should become sanctuaries. In Center for Humans ⅋ Nature [online]. Dostupné z: [cit. 17.1.2021]

Marino, L., Lilienfeld, S., O., Malamud, R., Nathan N., & Brogliod, R. (2010). Do Zoos and Aquariums promote attitude change in visitors? A critical evaluation of the American Zoo and Aquarium study. Society and Animals 18, 126-138.

Margodt, K. (2000). The Welfare Ark: Suggestions for a Renewed Policy in Zoos. Brussels: VUB University Press

Margodt, K. (2010). Zoos as welfare arks? Reflection on an ethical course for zoos. In R. R. Acampora (ed.), Metamorphoses of the ZOO: Animal Encounter after Noah, 11-36. Plymouth, Lexington Books.

Martens, P., Hansart, C., & Su, B. (2019). Attitudes of young adults toward animals—the case of high school students in Belgium and The Netherlands. Animals, 9(3), 88, 1-12.

Naess, A. (1994). Ecosophy T: Deep versus shallow ecology. In L. P. Pojman (ed.). Environmental Ethics. 105-112. Boston: Jones and Barlett Publisher.

Nussbaum, M., C. (2005). Beyond “Compassion and Humanity”. Justice for Nonhuman Animals. In C. R., & Nussbaum, M. C. (Eds.). Animal rights: Current debates and new directions. Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305104.003.0015

Nygren, N., V., Ojalammi, S. (2018). Conservation education in zoos – a literature review. TRACE ∴ Finnish Journal for Human-Animal Studies 4, 62-76.

Palmer, C., Morrin, H., & Sandøe, P. (2020) Defensible Zoos and Aquariums. In The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics. 394-406. New York: Routledge.

[PETA] People for the ethical treatment of animals (© 2021). More info on animals used for entertainment [online]. In PETA [online]. Dostupné z: [cit. 24.2.2021]

Reading, P. R., & Miller, B. J. (2007). Attitudes and attitude change among zoo visitors. In A. Zimmermann at al. (eds.), Zoos in the 21st Century, 63-91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Regan, T., (1995). Are Zoos Morally Defensible? In Norton, B. G. & Hutchins, M. (eds.), Ethics on the Ark. ZOOS, Animal Welfare, and Wildlife Conservation, 38-51. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.

Roe, K., McConney, A., & Mansfield, C. F. (2014). The role of zoos in modern society. A comparison of zoos’ reported priorities and what visitors believe they should be. Anthrozoös 27(4), 529-541.

Smith, L., Broad, S., & Weiler, B. (2008). A closer examination of the impact of zoo visits on visitor behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 16 (5), 544-562.

Staus, N. (2020). The educational value of zoos. In The Routledge Handbook of Animal Ethics, 367-380. New York: Routledge.

[WAZA] World Association of Zoos and aquariums (2020). Social change for conservation – The World Zoo and Aquarium Conservationwducation strategy. In World Association of Zoos and aquariums [online]. Dostupné z: [cit. 28.1.2021]


15. 09. 2021

How to Cite

Hrdá, M. (2021). The Educational Contribution of Zoo’s: Ethical Reflection. Envigogika, 16(1).



Reviewed Papers