Actor Analysis in Case Studies for (regional) Sustainable Development

Main Article Content

Simon Burandt
Fabienne Gralla
Beatrice John

Abstract

Specific local situations or phenomena pose specific challenges for regional (sustainable) development. These challenges require mostly local or regional solution paths for existing social-environmental systems that have to be investigated. Here the balance between studying and developing solution options can have a high impact on decision making and community choices.Processes of regional (sustainable) development are controlled by social players and these are the ones who finally decide and interact. These processes can be investigated with practical relevance in order to contribute (information) for sustainable solutions, for examples how to steer regional development processes, how to solve existing conflicts and to deliver information for strategy development.In this article, the method actor analysis is introduced and different options for implementation in practice are provided by using a case study conducted in the Ore Mountains as illustration. The described steps of an actor analysis can be read as guideline for implementing an analysis, but also the examples given are intended to show the potential and different options which aspects of social interactions could be in focus of investigation and how ideas or solutions with practical relevance can be generated.

Article Details

How to Cite
Burandt, S., Gralla, F., & John, B. (2015). Actor Analysis in Case Studies for (regional) Sustainable Development. Envigogika, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.433
Section
Reviewed Papers
Author Biographies

Simon Burandt

Leuphana University LüneburgFaculty of Sustainability & Graduate School

Fabienne Gralla

Leuphana University LüneburgCenter for Methods

Beatrice John

Leuphana University LüneburgInstitute for Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research

References

AA1000SES Technical Committee 2011. AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard 2011. Final Exposure Draft. AccountAbility. Available online under: http://www.accountability.org/images/content/5/4/542/AA1000SES%202010%20PRINT.pdf (30.12.2013).

Ackermann, Fran and Eden, Colin 1998. Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage Publications, London.

Ackermann, Fran and Eden, Colin 2003. Powerful and Interested Stakeholders Matter: Their Identification and Management. Management Science Working Paper No. 2.

Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

Brugha, Ruairí and Varvasovszky, Zsuzsa 2000. Stakeholder Analysis: a Review. Health Policy Planning 15 (3): 239–246.

Clark, William C. 2001. Research Systems for a Transition Toward Sustainability. In: GAIA. Bd. 10, H. 4, S. 264-266.

Crosby, Benjamin L. 1991. Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers. USAID’s Implementing Policy Change Project. Technical Notes, No.2. Available online under: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnabr482.pdf (30.12.2013).

Crutzen, P. J. 2006. The “Anthropocene”. In E. Ehlers & T. Krafft (Eds.), Earth System Science in the Anthropocene (pp. 13–18). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Dlouhá, J., & Burandt, S. 2014, in press. Design and evaluation of learning processes in an international sustainability oriented study programme. In search of a new educational quality and assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.096

EC, European Commission 2003. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document No.8. Public Participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Evans, Christen, Velarde, Sandra J., Prieto, Rocio P., Rao, Sheila N., Sertzen, Sandra, Dávila, Karina, Cronkleton, Peter and de Jong, Will 2006. Field guide to the future: four ways for communities to think ahead . Bennett, Elena and Zurek, Monika (eds.). Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Indonesia, ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.

Frischknecht, Peter and Schmidt, Barbara 2002. Umgang Mit Umweltsystemen: Methodik zum Bearbeiten von Umweltproblemen unter Berücksichtigung des Nachhaltigkeitsgedankens. ökom Verlag, München.

Gralla, Fabienne; John Beatrice 2013. Akteursanalyse. Werkstatt 1. Leuphana University Lüneburg.

Gray, Barbara 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Graymore, M. L., Sipe, N. G., & Rickson, R. E. (2008). Regional sustainability: How useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale? ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 67(3), 362–372. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.002

GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit 2007. Mainstreaming Participation. Multi-stakeholder management: Tools for Stakeholder Analysis: 10 building blocks for designing participatory systems of cooperation. From the series: Promoting participatory development in German development cooperation, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Eschborn. Available online under: http://www.fsnnetwork.org/sites/default/files/en-svmp-instrumente-akteuersanalyse.pdf (30.12.2013).

Hermans, Leon 2005. Actor Analysis for Water Resources Management. Putting the Promise into Practice. Eburon Uitgeverij, Delft.
Lynch, Richard L. 2012. Strategic management. 6. ed. Harlow, Essex: Pearson (Always learning).

Mader C., (2009) Principles for integrative development processes towards sustainability in regions, University of Graz.

Mitchell, Ronald K., Agle, Brandley R. and Wood, Donna J. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4), p. 874.

Newig, Jens 2012. Actor and Stakeholder Analysis. Lecture: Methods in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research. Leuphana University Lüneburg.

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of environmental management, 90(5), 1933–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001

Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin, III, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H.J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C.A. de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P.K. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R.W. Corell, V.J. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman,

K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J.A. Foley, 2009: A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475, doi:10.1038/461472a.
Schimank, Uwe 2007. Handeln und Strukturen. Einführung in die akteurstheoretische Soziologie. 3. Auflage, Weinheim-München: Juventa Verlag.

Schnegg, Michael (2010) “Ethnologie”. Stegbauer and Häußling (ed): Handbuch der Netzwerkforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, p. 859-69.
The BACC Author Team (2008): Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin. Springer-Verlag.

von Prittwitz, Volker 2007. Vergleichende Politikanalyse [Comparative Political Analysis]. Lucius&Lucius UTB, Stuttgart.

Wever, L., Krause, G., & Buck, B. H. (2015). Lessons from stakeholder dialogues on marine aquaculture in offshore wind farms: Perceived potentials, constraints and research gaps. Marine Policy, 51, 251–259. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.015

Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F. S., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability science, 7(S1), 5–24. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y

Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods (5. ed). Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage.