Evaluation of the quality of outdoor digital interpretation of natural heritage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.560Keywords:
Interpretation of natural heritage, digitalisation, evaluation, qualityAbstract
The study discusses the question of quality of field digital interpretation of natural heritage. It describes the process of defining the quality criteria, encompassing a combination of literature review, focus groups with experts, and field survey. In the last part it introduces and discusses the key quality criteria for recommendation for further authors of digital interpretation.
Downloads
References
Beck, L., & Cable, T. (2011). The Gifts of Interpretation. Urbana: Sagamore publishing.
Davies, J. (2014). On-site Digital Heritage Interpretation : Current uses and future possibilities at World Heritage Sites. Durham: Durham University.
Ham, S. H. (2013). Interpretation – making a difference on purpose. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.
Ham, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation : a practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.
Liarokapis, F., Sylaiou, S., & Mountain, D. (2008). Personalizing Virtual and Augmented Reality for Cultural Heritage Indoor and Outdoor Experiences. In The 9th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, VAST (2008), pp. 1–8.
Lindell, S. K. (2014). Reconciling technology and nature : the use of mobile technology in outdoor recreation. Thesis. Western Washington University.
Pendit, U. C., Aida, J., & Bakar, A. (2014). Mobile Augmented Reality for Enjoyable Informal Learning in Cultural Heritage Site. International Journal of Computer Applications, 92(14), 19-26.
Shin, D., Jung, J., & Chang, B. (2014). The psychology behind QR codes : User experience perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.004
Taggmanager.cz (2017). Naše stezky. Retrieved from http://www.taggmanager.cz/reference
Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting our heritage: Principles and Practices for Visitor Services. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Veverka, J. A. (2011). The interpretative training handbook. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.
Walmsley, J. & Crowe, L. (2016). What makes a good smartphone app for outdoor recreation? Outdoor recreation network, 27. Retrieved from https://www.outdoorrecreation.org.uk/stories/makes-good-smartphone-app-outdoor-recreation/
Zecha, S. (2012). Geocaching, a tool to support environmental education!?– An explorative study. Educational Research eJournal, 1(2), 177–188.
Zimmerman, H.T. & Land, S.M. (2015). Facilitating place-based learning in outdoor informal environments with mobile computers. TechTrends, 58(1), 77-83.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The publication of the journal is carried out in accordance with Czech law, in particular the Press Act No. 46/2000 Coll., the Copyright Act No. 121/2000 Coll., and the laws of the European Union. In accordance with the relevant provisions of Act No. 121/2000 Coll., the Copyright Act, as amended, the rights to published texts are always held by their author. The journal has only the right to use the text in the sense of its distribution through its printed and electronic form, in accordance with the provisions of Article 12(4)(b) of the Copyright Act.
