Moc v akci: možnosti a omezení v praxi vzdělávání pro udržitelný rozvoj

Autoři

  • Marie Öhman
  • Johan Öhman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.131

Abstrakt

Kontroverzní debaty o vzdělávání pro udržitelný rozvoj se přenášejí do oblasti výzkumné – v tomto případě je tématem oblast Foucaultova konceptu moci a znalostí. Autoři hledají souvislosti s jednáním vycházejícím z těchto skrytých předpokladů a domýšlejí důsledky pro vzdělávací praxi.

Metriky

Metriky se nahrávají ...

Biografie autora

Marie Öhman

Marie Öhman, Department of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden e-mail: marie.ohman@hi.oru.se

Johan Öhman

Johan ÖhmanDepartment of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden e-mail:  johan.ohman@hi.oru.se

Reference

Bonnet, M (1999). Education for Sustainable Development: a coherent philosophy for environmental education? Cambridge Journal of Education. 29 (3): 313-324.

Burchell, G; Gordon, C & Miller, P (1991). The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Elliott, J (1999). Sustainable society and environmental education: future perspectives and demands for the educational system. Cambridge Journal of Education. 29 (3): 325-341.

Foucault, M (1978/1991). Governmentality, in: Burchell, G, Gordon, C, & Miller, P, The Foucault effect; Studies in governmentality. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Foucault, M (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977.Pantheon, New York.

Foucault, M (1982). The subject and power, in: Faubion JD, Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, Volume 3: Power (pp 326-348).Penguin, London.

Jickling, B (2003). Environmental education and environmental advocacy. Revisited. Journal of Environmental Education. 34 (2): 20-27.

Jickling, B & Spork, H (1998). Education for the environment: a critique. Environmental Education Research. 4 (3): 309-328.

Rose, N (1998). Inventing our selves. Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Rose, N (1999). Powers of freedom. Reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Sauvé, L (1999). Environmental education between modernity and postmodernity: searching for an integrating educational framework. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education. 4: 9-36.

Stables, A & Scott, W (2002). The quest for holism in education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research. 8 (1): 53-60.

UNESCO (2005). Report by the Director-General on the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: International Implementation Scheme and UNESCO’s Contribution to the Implementation of the Decade.Available on line at: http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.phpURL_ID=36025&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (accessed 7 September 2006).

Wals, AEJ & Jickling, B (2000). Process-based environmental education seeking standards without standardizing, in: BB Jensen, K Schnack & V Simovska (eds), Critical environmental and health education: research issues and challenges, pp. 127-149. The Danish University of Education, Research Centre for Environmental and Health Education, Copenhagen.

Öhman, M (forthcoming). Kropp och makt i rörelse (Body and power in motion). Örebro Studies in Sociology, Örebro University, Örebro.

Stahování

Publikováno

31. 05. 2008

Jak citovat

Öhman, M., & Öhman, J. (2008). Moc v akci: možnosti a omezení v praxi vzdělávání pro udržitelný rozvoj. Envigogika, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.131

Číslo

Sekce

Inspirace